Government & Tax Payments Credit-Card Surcharge: State-by-State Compliance Checklist (2026)
A per-state landing checklist for government entities and tax collectors: the 52-jurisdiction matrix plus the flat convenience-fee model used for taxes and fees.
Last verified: 2026-09 · Educational reference, not legal advice
A percentage credit-card surcharge follows the network baseline where permitted, but government tax and fee collection almost always uses a flat convenience fee — a fixed amount for paying by card, typically through a third-party processor (e.g., the IRS uses authorized processors charging about 1.75%–1.85% with a minimum). Many state statutes authorize governments to recover card costs.
Convenience fee model for taxes
Government convenience fees are commonly a flat or processor-set fee on card payments for taxes and fees, disclosed before payment and authorized by state law. The IRS, for example, collects through authorized processors that charge a convenience fee (not a surcharge). Confirm your state statute and your processor agreement before adding a fee.
| State | Status | Surcharge? | Cash discount? | State cap | Key rule |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama (AL) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Alaska (AK) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Arizona (AZ) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Arkansas (AR) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| California (CA) | Contested | No | Yes | — | Statute bans surcharging; legal status contested — cash discount recommended |
| Colorado (CO) | Restricted | Yes | Yes | 2% | State cap 2% (lower than Visa 3%) |
| Connecticut (CT) | Banned | No | Yes | — | Surcharging prohibited by state law |
| Delaware (DE) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| District of Columbia (DC) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Florida (FL) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Georgia (GA) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Hawaii (HI) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Idaho (ID) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Illinois (IL) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Indiana (IN) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Iowa (IA) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Kansas (KS) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Kentucky (KY) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Louisiana (LA) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Maine (ME) | Contested | No | Yes | — | Statute bans surcharging; legal status contested — cash discount recommended |
| Maryland (MD) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Massachusetts (MA) | Banned | No | Yes | — | Surcharging prohibited by state law |
| Michigan (MI) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Minnesota (MN) | Restricted | Yes | Yes | Actual cost | Cap = your actual processing cost |
| Mississippi (MS) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Missouri (MO) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Montana (MT) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Nebraska (NE) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Nevada (NV) | Restricted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| New Hampshire (NH) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| New Jersey (NJ) | Restricted | Yes | Yes | Actual cost | Cap = your actual processing cost |
| New Mexico (NM) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| New York (NY) | Restricted | No | Yes | — | No line-item surcharge; cash-discount model required |
| North Carolina (NC) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| North Dakota (ND) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Ohio (OH) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Oklahoma (OK) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Oregon (OR) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Pennsylvania (PA) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Rhode Island (RI) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| South Carolina (SC) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| South Dakota (SD) | Restricted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Tennessee (TN) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Texas (TX) | Contested | No | Yes | — | Statute bans surcharging; legal status contested — cash discount recommended |
| Utah (UT) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Vermont (VT) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Virginia (VA) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Washington (WA) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| West Virginia (WV) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Wisconsin (WI) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Wyoming (WY) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Puerto Rico (PR) | Banned | No | Yes | — | Surcharging prohibited by state law |
Your government go-live checklist
- Confirm your state in the matrix if you plan a percentage surcharge (banned in CT, MA, PR; contested in CA, TX, ME).
- Decide model: flat government convenience fee (standard) vs percentage surcharge (more restricted).
- Verify your state statute authorizes the government entity to recover card costs from payers.
- Select an authorized third-party processor and disclose the fee before payment.
- If surcharging, submit the ~30-day acquirer notice and exclude debit cards.
- Print the fee as a separate receipt line; for a flat fee, show it before the payer submits.
Government tax and fee collection typically uses a flat convenience fee through an authorized processor (the IRS uses processors charging roughly 1.75%–1.85% with a minimum), not a percentage surcharge. Confirm your state statute authorizes cost recovery.
Compare surcharge vs convenience fee.Open the fee-types guide →
Related guides
Frequently asked questions
Where the state permits surcharging, yes, under the network caps — but governments almost always use a flat convenience fee through an authorized processor instead, which many state statutes explicitly allow.
The IRS collects through authorized third-party processors that charge a convenience fee (about 1.75%–1.85% with a minimum), not a surcharge added by the agency itself.
For a government convenience fee, yes — confirm your state statute authorizes the entity to recover card costs from payers before adding any fee.
Educational content, not legal advice. Cashbizly is an independent educational resource. Nothing here is personalized legal advice and it does not replace a licensed attorney or your state’s Attorney General.
Our state-by-state status reflects the consensus of published 2025–2026 compliance guides (card-network rules, LawPay, Stax, NCSL) as of the “last verified” date on each page. Surcharge law changes frequently and is actively litigated — always confirm current figures with your state Attorney General or a professional. Read our full disclaimer.