Landlords & Rent Payments Credit-Card Surcharge: State-by-State Compliance Checklist (2026)
A per-state landing checklist for landlords: whether you can surcharge rent by card, the 52-jurisdiction matrix, and the lease + landlord-tenant law steps to check first.
Last verified: 2026-09 · Educational reference, not legal advice
Where surcharging is permitted under card-network rules, a landlord may add a credit-card surcharge — but only if the lease and state landlord-tenant law also allow passing card costs to tenants. Many leases and some state statutes restrict or prohibit extra tenant fees, so confirm before enabling anything.
Lease and third-party portals
If tenants pay rent through a portal (AppFolio, Buildium, PayPal, etc.), the fee shown is typically the portal’s convenience fee, disclosed separately by the processor — not your surcharge. Your own surcharge is additional and must follow both the lease and network rules.
| State | Status | Surcharge? | Cash discount? | State cap | Key rule |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama (AL) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Alaska (AK) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Arizona (AZ) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Arkansas (AR) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| California (CA) | Contested | No | Yes | — | Statute bans surcharging; legal status contested — cash discount recommended |
| Colorado (CO) | Restricted | Yes | Yes | 2% | State cap 2% (lower than Visa 3%) |
| Connecticut (CT) | Banned | No | Yes | — | Surcharging prohibited by state law |
| Delaware (DE) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| District of Columbia (DC) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Florida (FL) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Georgia (GA) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Hawaii (HI) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Idaho (ID) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Illinois (IL) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Indiana (IN) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Iowa (IA) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Kansas (KS) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Kentucky (KY) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Louisiana (LA) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Maine (ME) | Contested | No | Yes | — | Statute bans surcharging; legal status contested — cash discount recommended |
| Maryland (MD) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Massachusetts (MA) | Banned | No | Yes | — | Surcharging prohibited by state law |
| Michigan (MI) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Minnesota (MN) | Restricted | Yes | Yes | Actual cost | Cap = your actual processing cost |
| Mississippi (MS) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Missouri (MO) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Montana (MT) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Nebraska (NE) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Nevada (NV) | Restricted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| New Hampshire (NH) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| New Jersey (NJ) | Restricted | Yes | Yes | Actual cost | Cap = your actual processing cost |
| New Mexico (NM) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| New York (NY) | Restricted | No | Yes | — | No line-item surcharge; cash-discount model required |
| North Carolina (NC) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| North Dakota (ND) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Ohio (OH) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Oklahoma (OK) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Oregon (OR) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Pennsylvania (PA) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Rhode Island (RI) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| South Carolina (SC) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| South Dakota (SD) | Restricted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Tennessee (TN) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Texas (TX) | Contested | No | Yes | — | Statute bans surcharging; legal status contested — cash discount recommended |
| Utah (UT) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Vermont (VT) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Virginia (VA) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Washington (WA) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| West Virginia (WV) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Wisconsin (WI) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Wyoming (WY) | Permitted | Yes | Yes | 3% | Visa 3% / Mastercard 4% (3% effective if you accept both); lower of cap or actual cost |
| Puerto Rico (PR) | Banned | No | Yes | — | Surcharging prohibited by state law |
Your landlord go-live checklist
- Read the lease: does it permit passing card-processing costs to the tenant? If silent or prohibitive, do not add a fee.
- Check your state landlord-tenant statute for any rule on tenant card fees.
- If both allow it and the state permits surcharging, submit the ~30-day acquirer notice and exclude debit.
- Disclose the fee before the tenant pays and print it as a separate receipt line.
- If a portal already charges a convenience fee, coordinate so the tenant is not double-charged.
- In a banned/contested state, do not surcharge; a cash-discount option is generally not applicable to rent.
Some leases and state landlord-tenant statutes restrict or prohibit charging tenants extra card fees. Confirm your lease and state law before adding any fee — the card-network permission alone is not enough.
Review the surcharge-vs-convenience-fee distinction.Open the fee-types guide →
Related guides
Frequently asked questions
Only if the state permits surcharging AND the lease and any applicable landlord-tenant law allow passing card costs to the tenant. Many leases prohibit it, so check first.
It is usually the portal processor’s convenience fee, disclosed separately by the third party — not a landlord surcharge. The two are distinct and should not be stacked.
A true cash discount (lower price for paying by check/ACH) may be feasible where the lease allows it, but it is uncommon for rent and should be reviewed against the lease and state law.
Educational content, not legal advice. Cashbizly is an independent educational resource. Nothing here is personalized legal advice and it does not replace a licensed attorney or your state’s Attorney General.
Our state-by-state status reflects the consensus of published 2025–2026 compliance guides (card-network rules, LawPay, Stax, NCSL) as of the “last verified” date on each page. Surcharge law changes frequently and is actively litigated — always confirm current figures with your state Attorney General or a professional. Read our full disclaimer.