How Much Should You Order?
Results
Visualization
How It Works
EOQ = sqrt(2 x D x S / H), where D = annual demand, S = cost per order, H = holding cost per unit per year (unit cost x holding %). It balances the trade-off: small frequent orders raise ordering cost, large orders raise storage cost. This is the classic Wilson EOQ formula from operations management.
What Should You Do?
Scenario 1: cutting cost-per-order to $25 raises EOQ to ~1,095 (fewer, larger orders). Scenario 2: a higher holding cost (30%) shrinks EOQ to ~632. Scenario 3: demand swings make the point estimate move — rerun as demand changes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a realistic holding cost?
Often 15-30% of unit cost annually (storage, capital, spoilage, insurance). Underestimating inflates EOQ.
Does EOQ assume steady demand?
Yes — constant demand and instant replenishment. Add safety stock separately (see Reorder Point).
Why minimize total cost, not just holding?
Because ordering cost rises as you hold less; the minimum is where the two curves cross.
Authoritative References
- Investopedia — EOQ — Wilson EOQ formula and assumptions.
- Corporate Finance Institute — Inventory — Inventory cost trade-offs.